tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18602000.post2848473028469761705..comments2023-11-05T08:08:48.848-05:00Comments on The Bunburyist: Chicago Confidential (1957).Elizabeth Foxwellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10151714538393844565noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18602000.post-89937198861477842922013-08-21T06:55:07.720-04:002013-08-21T06:55:07.720-04:00The NYT review of the film of the time is not too ...The NYT review of the film of the time is not too complimentary, and press on the "Confidential" books tends to trash their tabloidy elements, but it seems to me that the latter would (sadly) suit our culture of today.Elizabeth Foxwellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10151714538393844565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18602000.post-14351604609338573872013-08-21T02:27:07.222-04:002013-08-21T02:27:07.222-04:00The only one of those books I've actually held...The only one of those books I've actually held and read for bad laughs some thirty years ago is NEW YORK CONFIDENTIAL, but mean to eventually read their "Mars Confidential" piece in AMAZING ca. 1953 when the mood strikes me...how's the film as a film? Anything with Garland and Cook is doing at least two things correctly.Todd Masonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01815516018079824802noreply@blogger.com