![]() |
| James Gould Cozzens |
Further reading: my positive take on The Just and the Unjust.
Featuring History of Mystery/Detective Fiction and Other Literary Ramblings of Elizabeth Foxwell
![]() |
| James Gould Cozzens |
There's no focal point with a jury; the jury is the public itself. That's why a jury can say when a judge couldn't, "I don't care what the law is, that isn't right and I won't do it." It's the greatest prerogative of free men. . . .We pay a price for lay participation in the law; but it's a necessary expense.—James Gould Cozzens, The Just and the Unjust 428
The effect of a murder trial on a small Pennsylvania town is the focus of James Gould Cozzens's The Just and the Unjust (1942), which is mostly told through the point of view of Abner Coates, the young assistant district attorney. Because the victim is an unpleasant farmer involved with drugs and the accused perpetrators little more than thugs, the local law enforcement community regards the case more as a matter of duty than one of justice. The flamboyant defense attorney seems more interested in scoring points against the methodical district attorney, and Coates, who is the son of a prominent judge and is approached to run for DA by the local political boss, wonders if he will lose his soul if he takes the job.
The blog of Harvard's Houghton Library Modern Books and Manuscripts reports on its acquisition of materials relating to author James Gould Cozzens (1903-78). Cozzens won the Pulitzer Prize for his World War II book Guard of Honor (1948), and his legal novel The Just and the Unjust (1942) appears on the Haycraft-Queen Cornerstone list.
James Gould Cozzens, who won the Pulitzer Prize for his 1948 novel Guard of Honor but also has a place on the Haycraft-Queen Cornerstone list for his 1942 novel The Just and the Unjust, was born today in 1903. He died in 1978.