Showing posts with label George Orwell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Orwell. Show all posts

Friday, October 01, 2010

Mystery vs. sci fi:
E. X. Ferrars against John Wyndham.

As the sustainability of genre fiction is a topic of perpetual discussion, it seems there is nothing new under the sun. In April 1954, a spirited exchange in print occurred between John Wyndham Parkes Lucas Beynon Harris (aka John Wyndham, author of Day of the Triffids, 1951) and Morna Doris Brown (aka E. X. Ferrars [US] and Elizabeth Ferrars [UK], Detection Club member and a founder of the British Crime Writers Assn).

In "Roar of Rockets!" in the 2 Apr 1954 issue of John O'London's Weekly, Wyndham asserted that science fiction would replace mystery fiction.  Ferrars replied the following week in "No Danger to Detectives!".

Wyndham theorized that a shift in New York publishing to science fiction was because "there has been too much murder going on for too long." He stated, "The number of people who are bored with routine detective stories has been increasing.  . . . The present outbreak of rockets may be seen as the assault weapons softening up the detectives" (1–2). He dubbed some fictional detectives "long-toothed bores." However, he does not reserve his criticism to mysteries, addressing weaknesses in his own genre ("Wells's conceptions degenerated into a kind of super-gadgetry"). He also cited his choices for exemplary works (Vonnegut's Player Piano, Orwell's 1984, Lewis's cautionary It Can't Happen Here)—perhaps implying that mystery fiction could not propose their equals.

Ferrars, in her reply, pointed out that The Brothers Karamazov is a detective story and that both Shakespeare and Sophocles were concerned with murder. She also listed the strengths of the genre: "The detective story must deal with human emotions, with violence, fear, guilt, suspicion, courage, intelligence, and moral values . . . suspense must be created, curiosity stimulated” (2). Science fiction, she asserted, "cannot be redeemed by answering that fascinating question, whodunit? or give the reader the satisfaction of winning or losing in a game of wits with the writer."

Thankfully, Wyndham's prognostications have not come to pass. Indeed, it's hard to imagine one genre's fans doing a whole-scale jump to another, especially if they enjoy reading across genres.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Orwell on Hornung and Chase.

This C-Span podcast on the George Orwell essay collection All Art Is Propaganda (featuring George Packer and Christopher Hitchens) has a small section on "Raffles and Miss Blandish," Orwell's 1944 piece comparing E. W. Hornung's Raffles works to James Hadley Chase's No Orchids for Miss Blandish (1939). Says Orwell, "[Raffles and Bunny] think of themselves not as sinners but as renegades, or simply outcasts."

You can read further here.

Sunday, September 07, 2008

George Orwell, blogger.

The Orwell Prize is posting George Orwell's diary entries, day by day. So far, it's mostly Orwellian musings about the weather and nature.

There are also two upcoming volumes of Orwellian essays: Facing Unpleasant Facts: Narrative Essays and All Art Is Propaganda: Critical Essays.

(Hat tip to The Scholarly Kitchen)